Archive June 2011
|Bigamy and Why Vincent Calvino will never get Married
Last week rather than
criminal activity I wrote about metaphysical disturbances. This week I return to
crime. Criminal behavior is conduct or activity that a consensus of people
within a culture chooses to sanction. Murder is universally criminalized. No
society that we have evidence of has allowed members of the community to freely
murder each other. The state always intervenes. We also use the criminal law to
rope off the perimeter of what is an acceptable family unit. Bigamy is the legal
Most countries forbid a
man to have more than one wife, or a woman from having more than one husband
(which is technically called polyandry). That is two plus one, at the
same time is a big no, no. You might argue that in the West, with easy divorce,
sequential marrying has become an overpriced, but degraded form of bigamy. But
in places like Senegal, Mali, Ghana, Nigeria (west Africa) and most Muslim
countries, in practice, there is no law against bigamy. The numbers (there is a
limit) don’t bother them the way it bothers a lot of people.
Thailand is an example of
a country where officially a man can have only one ‘legal’ (meaning registered)
wife. But in practice a large number of Thai men have unofficial ‘minor wives’.
Polygyny is another concept. It is usually defined as a family unit with one man
and multiple wives. It is another one of those impossible-to-remember-how- to
spell terms best left to dusty sociology books.
If you live in California,
here are the steps to report
bigamists. There isn’t information whether
there is a reward in California for dropping the dime on a bigamists.
Sonthi Boonyaratglin, former Commander-in-Chief of the
Royal Thai Army and former head of the Council for National
military junta that ruled the kingdom, according to Wikipedia has two wives. He is also a Muslim
and has made no attempt to conceal his matrimonial status. And as far as can be
known, no one has sought to arrest him on charges of bigamy. Indeed there
appears to be an unofficial policy of allowing Muslims to have more than one
wife. Indeed, it seems the unofficial practice is not to prosecute bigamists in
In India, with both Hindu and Muslim
populations, the former prohibiting bigamy and the latter allowing it, there has
been the occasional conversion to Islam in order to marry a second wife without
divorcing the first. It didn’t work well for a politician who tried
It might be useful to seek
out legal advice before taking on that second, third or fourth wife. Though, as
a former lawyer, I can tell you the advice will be that marrying a second woman
without divorcing the first is a breach of Thai law. But will you go to prison?
Bigamy isn’t exactly murder. The answer a lawyer would give is: it depends on a
number of factors, including: your religion, nationality, social status, and
attitude of the family of those involved. Or he/she might say—your chances of
getting away with the crime are pretty good. Just get on with it and see what
happens. Then stick the client with a bill for a grand. Anyone thinking about
bigamy usually has got a high pain threshold and an apparently high capacity for
spending money on a whim. The potential bigamist is one of the best clients a
lawyer could have.
Now, after the lawyer
rant, back to Thai law. Marriage registration in Thailand is done on a
provincial basis. Given there are seventy-seven provinces, and the lack of
computerized systems in some of the more remote provinces has opened up
possibilities for the man wishing to register more than one wife.
In 2005, a Bangkok Senator
named Wallop was quoted by The
Nation as saying, “officials at the
Provincial Administration Department of the Interior Ministry had confirmed that
married men often registered double or even triple marriages by taking new
brides at remote locations where official computer systems were not available to
check their marital status. A few polygamous souls married even four times
without a single divorce, Wallop added.”
Thai wives had complained
to the government and they ‘looked into it’ and with most things the government
looks into, they just looked.
Thai law is clear on this
status issue, providing, “Applicants must not be currently married.” Conditions
of Eligibility for Marriage, Thai Civil Law, B.E. 2529. But Thai law is clear on
a large number of matters and that doesn’t necessarily mean the implementation
and enforcement of the law is consistent or reliable.
Thailand isn’t unique in
the non-enforcement of the bigamy law. Canada also prohibits polygyny by law
although there hasn’t been a prosecution for violating that law for sixty
The media loves a good
bigamy story (as obviously do bloggers). A twenty-four year old Thai man called
Mr. Wichai, a native of Samut Songkram province, who by all accounts was a
pretty ordinary fellow. He earned his livelihood hawking second-hand goods. But
he must have had something quite special going for him as he married, (according to
gorgeous twins named Ms. Sirintara and Ms. Thipawan, aged twenty-two. The
bridegroom professed “his sincerest ‘equal love’ for both of them.” Apparently
both sets of parents were very happy for the newly wedded threesome. Mr. Wichai
sweetened the pie by contributing a dowry of “eight baht of gold and 80,000
baht” for each of his new brides. There was no mention of how a second-handed
goods sales guy got his hands on that kind of wealth. In fairness, that is an
omission from many local stories involving politicians, police, soldiers, or
ordinary second-hand merchandise vendors.
Every man would like to
have had Mr. Wichai’s mother as their own. Somehow I can’t imagine my mother
preparing two rooms in the family house for her son and his two brides. But Mr.
Wichai’s mother did. The question lurking in the back of everyone’s lurid mind
was what were the sleeping arrangements? Mr. Wichai was prepared, and quoted as
saying, “’Absolutely no problems! For the first three nights of the week, I will
sleep with Ms. Thipawan and the next three will be spent with Ms Sirintara. As
for every Saturday, the three of us will sleep together’.” Right out of the
Ten Minute Manager for Bigamists: Guide of How to Manage Your Time
From time to time, it
would be good if the press filed follow up reports to see how the schedule has
worked out, whether any police have been around with warrants, and whether he
claims tax deduction for both wives. At the end of the day, in the case of the
crime of bigamy, at least in Thailand and Canada, there’s no ground swell to
charge and imprisonment the miscreants.
There is a downside (isn’t
there always?) in turning a blind eye to the Mr. Wichais of the Asian world.
Given a preference for male babies there is a fairly significant imbalance
between males and females. Allowing the alpha males with tough and status to
take two or three or more women out of the marriage market leaves that many more
males without the hope of finding a woman to marry. History has a lesson that
when too many young men fighting over too few women often leads to violence and
war. While Mr. Wichai has a rather tight schedule. The idle, single young men
who won’t be finding a wife, have time on their hands and anger in their hearts.
There are other more serious crimes that such men ultimately commit without the
presence of a good woman to keep their impulses in check. The tragedy of life is
there is no free lunch.
My feeling is that over
time Mr. Wichai case might provide evidence of a theory I have as to why neither
Thailand nor Canada actively goes after bigamists. It is this. Bigamy is one of
the few crimes where the perpetrator is most likely to become the victim. If he
is indeed married to several women at the same time, with until death do us
part, that sound pretty similar to a series of consecutive life sentence without
the possibility of parole. He’s joined the serial killer who also fall into the
throw away the key sentencing category.
If after the romantic
interlude, things don’t turn out—those extra partners increase the probability
of conflict—well, you get the picture. He’s gonna suffer big time. That lawyer’s
fee cited above, there was a reason for talking about a grand fee to warn the
guy to have second thoughts before those additional weddings. Because when he
comes back through the door after one of the wives goes after him legally, that
one grand is just a nice warm up to the total damage lawyers and courts will be
inflicted on him. And rather than going back to a lonely apartment to drink a
nice whiskey, he goes back to a couple of other women waiting for him. I don’t
think they’re gonna be in a great mood. He’s gonna wish for solitary confinement
in a maximum security prison is my guess.
As that Asian philosopher
Vincent Calvino once said: “One wife is never enough, and two are one too
Having been married for
ten years to one intelligent, caring, insightful and kind wife, I can say that
Calvino is wrong on this one. With the right woman, one wife can indeed be just
right. May be its time for Vincent Calvino to get married. And as a writer, I
have to stop blowing up, stabbing and shooting all the potential women he falls
in love with.
Note to self: Find Vinny a
wife pretty much like your own.
Note from agent: Are you
f***king crazy? Happiness would kill any noir crime series.
Note to Calvino: Nothing
personal. Just remember once you get too involved, it is inevitable. She’s gonna
get whacked. Sorry, but it’s the nature of the writing game.
I intended to write about crime this week. I promise that is true. This past week, Asia as is usually the case, was chock a block with crime stories. Sometimes the amount of crime, the scope and depth of the criminal classes overwhelms a blogger. Choosing one crime story over another becomes next to impossible.
In such dire straits, I have fallen back on the alternative to a crime story, and that is, of course, telling a good ghost story. You might well say, that ghost stories, at least in Thailand, are also a dime a dozen. I wouldn’t say that you’d be entirely wrong. But there is a ghost story that needs to be told this Friday 1st July (which just happens to be Canada Day).
Ghosts and crime stories aren’t usually lumped together as there is one big difference between the two. In Thailand, ghost stories are infinitely more believable, receive more balanced media coverage, and have far more consensus amongst the Thais than most of the crime or political stories. Those stories made them foot stomping mad. I am sticking with ghosts. This is the little known place where all Thais appear to be united. Few political differences exist between the Thais when it comes to ghosts.
Let me prove my point with a ghost story that has a political spin, and by nature, hints at crime. In many countries, the political leader lives in an official residence while in office. It is a wonderful perk that goes with the job. Taxpayers foot the bill for cleaning the drapes, repairing the air conditioners, cutting the grass, shoveling the snow (where applicable) and polishing the silver. The White House and Number 10 Downing Street are among the best known official residential addresses. But there are dozens of palaces, houses, mansions that dot the planet that also function as official residence for elected leaders. Indeed in Canada, the leader of the opposition has an official residence. But even our provincial leaders have official residences. This is far better than the proceeds of crime. Free mansions, staff, grub, car, driver, and security detail means they get to live like investment bankers.
Thailand also has an official residence for the prime minister called Baan Phitsanulok (ºéÒ¹¾ÔÉ³ØâÅ¡). The house was built during the reign of King Vajiravudh. In 1979 it became the official residence of the Thai Prime Minister. But it has been rarely used in the same way that the White House or Number 10 Downing Street is used. While a prime minister might schedule a meeting at Baan Phitsanulok, they don’t normally spend much time there or sleep there. Or keep their families there. Baan Phitsanulok isn’t a place where prime ministers want to spend the night. Let me make it abundantly clear: the Thai Prime Minister has an official residence but they apparently refuse to move in and live there.
I was thinking of the official residence recently as I drove passed the family compound of the current Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva on Soi 31, Sukhumvit Road. For many years, I lived around the corner from Abhisit’s family compound. In those days, there was nothing distinguished about the compound from the outside. You’d drive past and never think twice what was behind the walls.
Recently I drove passed Khun Abhisit’s Soi 31 family compound and this was a different experience. Soldiers with M16s patrolled the perimeter. Barbwire is strung around the top of the wall making it look like a maximum-security prison in the interior of Columbia. At the intersection just before the Prime Minister Abhisit’s family compound are police booths, military positions, and many men in uniform.
Not only does the presence of all these heavily armed, uniformed men cause traffic jams, the overall impression is to convert this little oasis on Sukhumvit into an unofficial Green Zone like a compound in Baghdad. This part of Soi 31 doesn’t feel like Bangkok. Obviously the compound was never intended to be an official residence for a prime minister. This raises the question as to why the Prime Minister doesn’t live in the official residence? Why isn’t he sleeping at Baan Phistanulok?
The answer is ghosts. Baan Phistanulok is said to be haunted.
Yes, that’s right, as Thailand prepares for a highly contested, bitter election on Sunday 3rd July, no candidate for prime minister has promised the voters that, if elected, he will exorcise the Baan Phisasnulok ghost (or ghosts as the head count is open to question) and take up residence. And not only that, once in office, he (or more likely it will be a ‘she’) will make an all-out effort in the first ninety days in office to rid the Kingdom of all other evil spirits, ghosts and demons.
While the social and politically classes are divided over many political and social issues, including about who should govern and how they should govern the country, the Thai people seem to be united in their belief that nothing can be done to deal with the ghost problem at the official residence of the prime minister.
I have interviewed Thais in preparing this essay and none have said the ghost issue at Baan Phitsaulok will influence how they intend to vote on Sunday. Nonetheless, I have collected invaluable information.
Those supporting the re-election of the current government led by Prime Minister Abhisit, contend that the ghost at Baan Phitsanulok is on the payroll of former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, and that they have considerable evidence to support offshore, illegal payments by bad people have been funneled into the ghosts account. This evidence will be divulged soon.
The opposition political party led by Khun Yingluck Shinawatra, former Prime Minister Thaksin’s sister, says that her party has several policies that deal with the ghosts, including an amnesty and a newly created Ministry of Ghost Amnesty. Her amnesty would cover all ghosts going back two hundred years. All criminal charges and allegations will be dropped. All ghosts’ old rank, status and privileges will be restored.
She also denies any payments have been made to the Baan Phitsanulok ghost or to any other ghosts. That it has all been a misunderstanding as the ghost had always been willing to negotiate but no prime minister ever stuck around long enough to talk and get to know her (yes, the ghost is a she) Apparently the opposition’s fortuneteller has confirmed not only the gender of the Baan Phitsaulok ghost, but has received assurances that as of 4th July the ghost will decamp and take up residence at Soi 31, Sukhumvit Road until her pardon comes through.
The Prime Minister’s office did not return phone calls about his policies on appeasing the ghost.
Much is riding on the 3rd July election in Thailand. Even the ghosts, who may or may not be voting, have an apparent stake in the outcome.
With much thanks to Tito Haggardt for sending me this video.
|Hit and Run But You Can No Longer Hide: Violent Crime in the Age of the Internet
I sometimes wonder if the emotionality of crime has changed over time. Do we
feel the same about crime as our fathers, grandfather, or ten, twenty
generations back, felt about crime, punishment, judges, police, hangings,
prisons, or torture? In other words, have our modern sensibilities given us a
different perspective when we think about crime? How often do we come across
something that evokes thoughts about conduct and relationships within the world
Another question that sprang to mind is whether the way we perceive criminal
justice system is changed by our cultural experience and how connected we are to
technology, which allows us to share the experience of other cultures.
Is there more aggression, violence and moral indifference than in the past? I
am not sure how we can answer that question. We can look at the violence in
films, TV, and YouTube and it looks as if we glorify aggression. That may be a
justifiable conclusion but it still doesn’t answer the question: are we wearing
different moral lens than the ones our ancestors wore?
I think that twenty generations ago my ancestors (and yours) would have had a
much harder life. The idea of safety net, social justice, protection and
security wouldn’t have meant much to them. We have become softer, more fearful,
and more insecure even though on any objective scale we are far more secure and
safe than our ancestors.
I have a theory—it is nothing more than that—for the reason we feel less
secure when we should feel the opposite. There is a sense in many places in the
world that the elite classes have turned their backs on ordinary people, and not
only that, they have rubbed ordinary people’s noses in the fact they can commit
acts of violence and escape punishment. So long as there is a class that is
cloaked inside an institution and that institution is semi-autonomous, not under
the rule of law or the main democratic infrastructure, those outside that
institution are vulnerable to violence that has no legal recourse.
In other words, we accept the idea of violence might hit anyone at any time.
What is difficult to accept is the fact that certain agents of violence are
above the law. A recent example occurred in Thailand. According to The Bangkok Post, a 34-year old Major, a doctor in the
military, was the victim of what appeared to be an intentional hit and run.
The driver is thought to be an influential military officer and may also have
an influential father who is also a high-ranking officer. The facts according to
news reports are: a young female major arrived at her house to find her driveway
blocked. She thought it might be a patron at the restaurant next door. The
doctor wrote a note with the registration number of the car and gave it to an
employee of the restaurant to ask the owner to move his car from her
Later, she came out of her house, saw a car parked across the way, it honked
its horn at her, drove straight at her, dragging her thirty meters. She’s in a
hospital in coma. There are indications in the press report that the police are
very slow to proceed in this case, and that the military was slow to return the
car involved in the hit and run. And, indeed, there are circumstances to
indicate a different car was returned.
The colonel allegedly involved in the incident “surrendered” to the police,
claiming that the woman was at fault and injured herself when she “ran into” his
car. Something along the same lines was circulated not long ago in Thailand in
connection with assigning responsibility for the April/May 2010 gunshot deaths
of protestors in Bangkok streets: they were said not to have been shot by the
military, but had “run into bullets.”
The Bangkok Post also
said the colonel had tried to ring the emergency phone number 191 to request
that they intervene in the quarrel between him and the woman but couldn’t get a
connection. It is difficult to get the doctor’s side of the story as she’s in
Here is the YouTube video of the car striking the doctor taken from a CCTV
camera at the scene:
This incident occurred at a time when Thailand is going through a bitter
election campaign and questions of social justice, equality and fairness are at
the forefront. In the distant past, powerful elites no doubt did this kind of
thing to our ancestors. What is different now? The way and means of
communications have fundamentally changed. You can read this report and watch
the YouTube video anywhere in the world. You can judge yourself by watching the
video as to whether the doctor ran into the officer’s car.
It’s not just public record; it’s part of universal public record. People can
read, discuss and debate such a case from Berlin to Toronto to New York and
beyond. They can write about it. Tell their friends about it. What would have
been whispered about in candlelit coffee houses and homes now is caught in a
Add that to the aspirations of people for a more accountable government. By
that I mean, a government that removes the autonomy from autonomous
institutions, places which traditionally have shield their members against legal
recourse even though they’ve committed acts of violence.
Institutions are incredibly slow to change. They rarely change voluntarily.
Their members feel entitled to their privileges, benefits and immunities. The
struggle of democracy is to bring all citizens under the same set of laws. That
struggle will be a long one. Our ancestors wouldn’t have thought it worth the
fight. They had a point as they could be easily isolated and picked off, one by
one, until that deafening silence would have sent a powerful message to leave
the powerful alone. Social networks have changed that. WikiLeaks created the
possibility for accountability for official misconduct. It is a start. People
don’t feel so alone in the face of social injustice. Our expectations about this
sort of thing are evolving beyond anything our ancestors thought possible.
The ordinary person on an iPhone or computer is equipped to fight back with
the most powerful weapon in the modern arsenal—an Internet connection to the
world, a pipeline that ensures the worst incidents of criminal violence
committed by members of the elite are photographed, documented, reported to a
larger audience. Once that image circulates, it sears deep into the memory, and
become one more piece of evidence that the privileged institutions of the past
are in for a bumpy ride as they try to justify their immunities to a world
tired, worried and insecure about a world where such things can happen. To
|Psychic Justice and the Predatory Class
Three cases stand out this week in the world’s criminal justice system. One
was a police raid, helicopters, cars, reporters all descending on a rural
farmhouse outside Houston, Texas on a psychic’s claim of having a vision of a
mass grave on the premises. The second and third cases arose in China. In one, a
music student from a wealthy family was executed for stabbing a cyclist 8 times
after slightly injuring her in a driving accident. In the second Chinese case, a
truck driver ran over an ethnic Mongol herder, dragging him under his truck. The
driver given the death sentence; his passenger life imprisonment.
We tend to think of the West as having a criminal justice system that is
rational, logical and based on tangible evidence; and that the supernatural is
not part of the Western system. In the East, we have the image of soothsayers,
psychics, shamans and other mystics as embedded in all levels of society,
including the justice system.
How did the Houston police find themselves, based on a psychic’s prediction,
digging holes around someone’s house, searching for a mass grave? It seems there
were traces of blood and the smell of rotting meat. Only it turned out the
reality was far less exciting. The blood came from a drunk session where someone
cut their wrist, and the rotting meat from a broken down freezer.
Has any psychic ever having solved a single crime—using their psychic powers?
The answer is zero. The police have little choice but to follow up all reports
even though they may suspect the informant is a liar, stupid, mentally ill, or
The upside after the Houston case is police departments in Texas and
elsewhere—the Internet has spread the image of ‘egg-faced’ Houston cops across
the web—will likely mean that the next psychic who phones with reports of dead
bodies will have a hard time convincing the police to fire up the helicopters
and swoop in on the crime site.
It doesn’t take a psychic to predict that the rich and connected are dealt
with differently than members of the working class when they have a run in with
the law. A basic premise of criminal justice in any society is a central state
must contain the predatory class. A state that fails or refuses to do so quickly
loses legitimacy, citizens take to the streets, and unrest and violence rolls
out faster than tanks from third world barracks.
The problem is a conflict of interest. This occurs due to the fair amount of
overlap between the predatory class and the elites who are the politicians who
exert pressure on other institutions including the police and courts. No doubt
we all know individuals who are not predators by inclination but find that their
success aligns their interest with the predator class. Predators, as a class,
are rich, connected, powerful and influential. Predators are among the most
successful rent-seekers, monopolists, cartel members, and politicians orbit
around them like the earth revolves around the sun. And for much the same
reason: the pull of gravity. In the case of predators, the gravity is money.
Predators, as a class, wish to live above the law secluded in their private
Valhalla secure in the knowledge their wealth protects them and grants them
virtual immunity. When a son or daughter of a member of the predatory class
breaks the law, the central question is whether the state authorities will dish
out punishment or protect such a person.
When Chinese university music student Yao Jiaxin drove into Zhang Miao, who
was riding a bicycle, was slightly injured. Yao, described as the offspring from
“second-generation wealth,” believed that Zhang cause trouble over the issue of
compensation. Rather than facing the prospect of such a negotiation, he stabbed
her eight times. Even though he turned himself into the authorities, admitted
the crime, and his motive for killing the young woman, the People’s Court
sentenced him to death. The judge called Yao Jiaxin’s motive for the murder
This is a variation of the Thai proverb to kill the chicken to scare the
monkey. Rather than allow a child from the elite to murder a poor cyclist
because she might cause him trouble over compensation sends a loud and clear
message to the elites: Don’t think that your status, wealth and privilege grants
you an automatic entitlement to immunity. There are limits. Yao Jiaxin just
crossed on such limit. The vast bulk of the population in China will be
reassured with the execution of Yao Jiaxin, that the central state will not
tolerate law breaking by the elites.
Whether this is a precedent, a one-shot (no pun intended) warning, or larger
political statement with ramifications in other spheres, remains to be seen. As
Francis Fukuyama’s The Origin of the Political Order suggests, the
Chinese have an underdeveloped rule of law based system. The execution of Yao
Jiaxin may be an indication the Chinese authorities wish to strength the rule of
The elites might also belong to the ethnic group with the power to oppress a
smaller ethnic group. A good example of the use of the rule of law to diffuse
bad feelings running hot between the dominant Han and Mongol minority also
occurred in China. Li Lindong was given the death sentence after a six-hour
trial at the Intermediate People’s Court in the region’s Xilingol League. His
passenger (another driver) Lu Xiangdong, who rode in the cab of Li’s truck when
he drove over the herder, found himself convicted of homicide and received a
The political circumstances surrounding the Mongol herder’s death seem to
have been a significant factor. The dead man had been involved in a protest at
the time he was hit and dragged 145 meters. His death along with another Mongol
killed in a confrontation between locals and Chinese coal miners resulted in
demonstrations in northern Mongol pastureland. Herders and students went into
the streets with demands for justice and cultural protection for their
traditions and lifestyle.
Neither the circumstances nor the severity of the sentences handed out to the
truck driver and his passenger are found in a normal criminal case. The
political dimension—ethnic conflict, cultural oppression, and demonstrations—is
significant, making it difficult to treat the prosecution and sentence handed
out in isolation. And here’s where the rule of law should come into play. This
looks like an outcome in a system where the rule of law yields to political
considerations. In such a politicized system, even the Predatory Class may not
receive protection, and arguably would be better off under a rule of law system
separate from the political decision-making. Using the criminal justice system
to advance a political agenda is incompatible with the Western notion of rule of
law. It is one thing to rein in the elites and their children as in the case of
university music student Yao Jiaxin. But it violates the rule of law to
prosecute and sentence individuals from the dominant ethnic group to relieve the
political pressure created by another competing minority ethnic group.
From Texas to China we can confirm our bias that criminal justice systems are
flawed. That is of course a given. All institutions have weaknesses, gaps, and
inconsistencies because they are made and run by us. When the wheels come off
the wagon is when officials in charge of the criminal justice look to the
supernatural or the prevailing political winds before making a judgment. Justice
without an underpinning of fairness, equality, impartiality, independence and
reliability becomes a punch line on Jon Steward’s Daily Show or a cause to take
to the streets in protest. The elites must be fenced in or they will eat
everything including what is on your plate. It is here the predators lurk.
At the same time, the political class must leave the criminal justice system
to work through the evidence without interference or favor. This is a tall
order. Many countries have a culture of political interference. We live in an
ideologically divided world, one where everyone wants justice, and many states
fail or refuse to administer justice in a manner that is judged as equal and
fair by a large segment of the population. Around the world the TV news brings
you eyewitness accounts of the consequences in places the justice system has
broken down. These accounts demonstrate that the predators understand the
collapse of a legitimate state means there is no longer anyone to stop